Trump Claims $21 Million for ‘Friend PM Modi’ as USAID Funding Row Escalates: What’s the Truth?
The political landscape in India and the United States has been rocked by former President Donald Trump’s recent claims about USAID funding. Trump alleged that $21 million was allocated to boost voter turnout in India, referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi as his “friend.” This statement has ignited a fierce debate between India’s ruling BJP and opposition Congress, with both sides trading accusations. But what’s the real story behind this funding? Let’s dive deeper.
Trump’s Explosive Claim: $21 Million for India’s Voter Turnout
In a recent press conference, Donald Trump made headlines by stating, “We’re giving 21 million to my friend Prime Minister Modi and India for voter turnout. Why Are We Spending 21 million on elections in India? I want to increase voter turnout here too.” This statement came days after reports surfaced that the $21 million grant was actually intended for Bangladesh, not India.
Trump’s remarks have added fuel to an already heated political debate in India, with the BJP and Congress locking horns over the alleged misuse of foreign funds.
The Bangladesh Connection: Was the Funding Misreported?
Contrary to Trump’s claims, a report by The Indian Express revealed that the $21 million grant was approved for Bangladesh, not India. The funds were reportedly aimed at promoting political stability and democratic governance in Bangladesh. However, Trump’s repeated emphasis on India has raised questions about the accuracy of his statements and the potential political motives behind them.
BJP vs Congress: A War of Words
The controversy has sparked a bitter war of words between India’s ruling BJP and the opposition Congress. BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya took to social media to criticize the opposition, accusing them of spreading misinformation. Meanwhile, Congress leader Pawan Khera hit back, alleging that the BJP has a history of seeking foreign support to destabilize governments.
Khera tweeted, “If the grant was indeed for India, it’s a slap on the BJP’s face. Where were Ajit Doval, IB, and RAW when $21 million allegedly entered the country?”
USAID’s Role and the DOGE Controversy
The controversy took another twist when Trump revealed that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, had halted the 21 million funding to India.Trump Mentioned Separate 29 million grant for Bangladesh, which was allegedly awarded to a little-known firm with just two employees.
This move has raised eyebrows, with critics questioning the transparency of USAID’s funding processes and the role of foreign aid in domestic politics.
India’s Response: Breaking the Silence
After days of silence, the Indian government finally addressed the issue. The Ministry of External Affairs expressed concern over foreign interference in India’s internal matters, calling the allegations “deeply troubling.” A spokesperson stated, “Several departments and agencies in India work with USAID. They are currently reviewing the matter.”
Trump’s Repeated Attacks on USAID Funding
This isn’t the first time Trump has raised the issue of USAID funding. Earlier in the week, he accused the Biden administration of using the funds to interfere in India’s 2024 elections, though he provided no evidence to support his claims. Trump’s repeated focus on the issue has led many to speculate about his political motivations, especially as the 2024 US presidential election approaches.
The Bigger Picture: Implications for India-US Relations
The controversy comes at a time when India-US relations are already under scrutiny. While both nations have strengthened ties in recent years, allegations of foreign interference could strain the relationship. The Indian government’s measured response suggests a desire to avoid escalating tensions, but the political fallout within India is far from over.
Conclusion:
Donald Trump’s claims about $21 million in USAID funding for India have sparked a political firestorm, with implications for both domestic politics and international relations. As the BJP and Congress continue to trade barbs, the truth behind the funding remains unclear. One thing is certain: this controversy is far from settled, and its ripple effects will be felt for months to come.
